Tuesday, May 09, 2023

There's no England now...

 ...the title of which I ruthlessly pirated from this LGM post discussing the mix of assumptions, illusions, and legal fictions required to gain and maintain sovereignty.

In this case, of Great Britain

As a person I have - no, really, I'm not kidding - absolutely no opinion one way or another on monarchy as an institution in general and the British "royal" system in particular, other than it seems slightly more nonsensical than most human social gimmicks.

You're my boss because your mom and dad were my boss?

Get the fuck out.

But as We the People seem bound and determined to prove, the "Will of the People" can produce equally ridiculous results (Empty G? That you? Siddown and shaddup, girl.) so, well, okay. You be you, Brits. You want some king? Knock yourselves out.

That the current occupant of the throne of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Scotland, and (a little bit of) Ireland seems to be a doddering old goof whose beliefs include a pottage of nonsense and crunchy granola nature-fakery (along with some genuinely sensible love of nature itself...) seems unimportant to the big picture. The job is kind of central to the idea, not the person who does it.

This picture itself says it better than words...


The goofy hat and gold cocktail frock that encases the old white guy IS the king. The old white guy is just the dressmaker's dummy that holds it up.

The Brits want that? Fine. Not my circus, not my gold-encrusted monkey.

What made me think about all this mummery was turning on the television last Sunday morning (looking for the "other" British thing I think about, football - okay, "soccer", anyway...) and the first image that emerged out of the dark was this:

First, no question; the British do this whole "gorgeous, tactically useless, military spectacle" thing better than anyone. Part of it is the outfits; they've had centuries to get the dress uniforms right, and their Class A's (Number One dress? No, the Wikipedia tells me that the formal name is "Full Dress") are fucking sharp as a razor.

(Don't take this the wrong way; there's military and morale value to that "useless military spectacle". A soldier who looks and feels badass, whose unit looks badass, might well be more badass when the military chips are down.

Modern warfare often makes your own combat power invisible. In a world of artillery and tac air to be seen is to be hit and hit to be destroyed, so we do our best to disperse and hide ourselves.

So there's a value to be had in stepping out on parade, looking good and feeling strong. Illusion? Sure! But there's a sort of "dress for the job you want" to it there, too. And the British have got that shit down cold and hard. Drill Sergeant Lawes was all swoony.)

Second, and finally, though, it drives home the ironic point that kings (and presidents and caudillos and juntas and congresses and so forth) are, at bottom, what they are because they're hedged about with those marching troops.

The "importance" of those rulers, in a national and international sense, is almost entirely dependent on all those soldiers and sailors and fliers in their pretty clothes that marched down the wide mall to the pretty palace last Sunday.

Them - and their gajillion guns and tanks and trucks and hordes of ginormous battle ships and aircraft and bullets and missiles.

But in Britain? Now? Pretty soldiers and sailors and fliers on parade?

That's all this king has left.

The massive armies and fleets they symbolize? The storms of bombers? The sort of real military power that those big blocks of marching men (and now women) once meant? The temporal power that made the "King of Great Britain, Scotland, and Ireland" someone who had to be reckoned with?

Gone.

Modern Britain is a geopolitical afterthought. Not quite Andorra...yet. But no longer any sort of real global economic and political power alongside the real Greats.

And that's fine in a human sense. You can have a good and satisfying and happy life in Andorra as easily as in a Great Power. More easily, frankly, than in some - Russia or the PRC, I'm looking at you. For many of us in this Great Power? There's a cost to all those tanks and ships that might otherwise go to our lives. 

Ask some poor sod in a leaky tent down by the Cut in North Portland how that works.

Watching the pretty marching, it occurred to me that habits of thought are as difficult to break as habits of body. 

We think of "The King (or Queen) of England" as Somebody, a person of consequence, because there's still all that Stuff; palaces and crowns and fancy golden wagons. But mostly because of all those marching soldiers and sailors and fliers.

That's how they became kings and queens back in the day, right? Because they were the bosses of armies and fleets of the baddest motherfuckers around. Because swords (and rifles and cannon and missiles) hoicked them onto the Iron Throne and, beyond all laws and rules and customs, when push came to shove, kept them there by naked force, against all enemies foreign and domestic.

The U.S. president, the Russian premier, the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party?

Those people still have that power.

King Charles III?

Does not.

What makes that interesting is that we just talked about a time when that job, and the person who did that job, did have that power. When all those marching guys really did symbolize a scary badass guy's imperial reach, the mailed fist at the end of a very long royal arm.  

Not anymore.

So if I was British I'm not sure but that Sunday morning might have felt really odd, like I was taking part in a MMORPG, a sort of Great Power cosplay. 

All those gilded coaches and gorgeous uniforms and soldiers and sailors right out of the Empire? 

In the words of Bashō:

natsukusa ya
tsuwamono domo ga
yume no ato.

夏草や兵共がゆめの跡

That is to say;

Waves of summer grass:
All that remains of soldiers’
Impossible dreams.

So as not to end this silly rumination on a serious note, here's the "Wins the Internet" comment from the linked LGM post:

"*hushed Huw Edwards voice:
"And now the Rt. Hon. Capt. Penny Mordaunt RN, PC, MP, acting today in her role as Moistened Bint Peculiar, proceeds down the aisle carrying the magnificent Imperial State Scimitar which she will then lob at His Majesty in a part of the ceremony dating back to the time of King Arthur."

4 comments:

Brian Train said...

You're right about the drill and ceremonial.
One of my past jobs was being the adjutant of a composite infantry battalion that did just that.
It was impressive indeed, even when you knew who was hung over and who wasn't, and all about the little ritual of handing over the Daily Gummy Bear...

Brian

Dane900 said...

For my money the best part of the transition to CIIIR has been the American commentariat's harrumphing as if they're above all this, bringing it up only to ask, "I'm not sure why anyone's bringing this up." There's been a real protesting-too-much vibe that I've enjoyed a lot. But I suppose every country has its founding myths and this is yours; you do you, America.

As for my end? We're about to have a new face on our money, but apart from that nothing much is changing; we've had a peaceful transition of power from one symbol to the next, and that's really all you can ask for. Meanwhile, my ability to earn and have a life is almost totally in the hands of my boss up the street, and when he drops off the perch the business will almost certainly pass to his son: he'll be my boss largely because his father was my boss, an aspect of feudalism that's been almost perfectly preserved in the modern economy. The more things change, hey?

I think there are dark times ahead for the U.K., much of it of their own making. Having once been master of a colonial empire seems to mess with a country's head quite badly (see also: Turkey, Hungary, and of course, Russia), and it's going to be even worse as the former global capital returns to the backwater status it held in the Middle Ages. The continuity of a line of monarchs from that time to this might help them through that, or might hinder it, I don't know. We'll just have to see.

FDChief said...

Yeah, I get a laugh out of that. I wish they'd just be honest and say that they enjoy all the pretty marching and crowns and dresses and stuff; I mean, that's kind of the point of having monarchs now, and why not admit they're fun in a way that presidents and premiers aren't.

Britain seems to have a very weird vibe about the wrap-up of empire. Aside from the pure Niall Ferguson imperialist nostalgics there seems to be a sort of grumpy refusal to accept, as you put it, "backwater status" among a lot of (at least many white) Britons. Plus the kind of odd unhappiness that with empires come imperial subjects! You can't have a Raj without local people to raj over, and when those people you've ostensibly been "Britishizing" then show up in Britain it seems kind of irking to be shitty about them.

I think that's where the monarchy could help, by becoming a sort of rally point for Britons, whether their families come from Essex or Rawalpindi or Grenada. Whether they can? I'll be curious to see...

Don Francisco said...

The weird vibe about the break up of empire is a stubborn one. We are seeing some better history about this, but it gets heavy backlash from the right who don't want to talk about wealth made from slavery and the impoverishing large parts of the c18/19/20th world for the benefit of the ruling class and British economy. Something our Tory govt has been particularly keen on supporting.

I have mixed feelings on the coronation. On the one hand, like recent weddings it's a glitzy show that make a chunk of the population happy for mostly harmless reasons (and we got a holiday). But this event felt a lot more brittle somehow, maybe there is only so much facade you can take. Having to humor Royal supporters tell us we should be proud as 'this is our history'. You know the history I'm proud of? Functioning social democracy. Totally up for a celebration of that.