Sunday, March 14, 2021

Spring forward

 I turned the clock forward this morning not long after the Little Cat did her usual meowing, myurping "OMFG I AM SO HUNGRY!!!" dance on my pillow, the sixty-fourth time in my life that change has occurred.

I've always lived with the time change, one hour in the spring, another in the fall, part of the cycle of the year like the solstices and equinoxes. I don't really even think about it, or, at least I hadn't until recently. It was just something you did twice a year.

But apparently the time change is now a Thing. Twice a year now I run across messages from friends and acquaintances complaining about the time change as if it was the biannual equivalent of flying across eleven time zones. The news feed always seems to cough up a piece about how many people die or are maimed each year by the time shift.

This is all relatively recent; as short a time as a decade ago I don't recall seeing this bellyaching about the clock or, if I did, it was treated like a sort of flat-Earth crankism.

Now?

The Oregon state Senate passed a bill requiring the state to remain on daylight savings time year-round.

We're not alone; apparently something like a fifth of the U.S. states have one of these "permanent DST" bills as state law. Doesn't matter if the feds don't concur, mind, you. But there's federal legislation, too, so who knows?

Here's the weird part about all this.

Humans have been doing this time-change thing since before the Paleolithic. It's call "sunrise", and it's because humans are predominantly diurnal and our activity is largely confined to the daylight hours. Mostly because our night vision sucks, but for whatever the reasons we tend to become active in the light and retreat into somnolence in the dark.

But that change occurs two or three minutes a day over the course of the year. To try and do that now that we're slaves to the mechanical clock? 

Unpossible.

So, instead, we do it all in a jump twice a year, so that "sunrise" will match roughly with the old liturgical hour of Lauds and "six a.m." with Prime and Vespers with "the lighting of the lamps".

I'm not sure whether it's me, or just peculiarity of fussing about something that is a practical accommodation to human behavior that predates the relentless ticking of the clocks, that seems so weird.

6 comments:

Brian Train said...

I'm fine with never changing the clocks again, but I want permanent standard time, not permanent DST, for the reasons in the below article.

https://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/op-ed/comment-the-many-dark-sides-of-permanent-daylight-time-1.24044806

The last time this came up in the news, the local TV station had a split screen between a sleep research in the Department of Psychology at Simon Fraser University and a soccer mom from the Interior "debating" the choice.
The sleep researcher gave the reasons outlined in the article and more, and the soccer mom essentially just kept repeating, "but, but permanent DST is what everyone voted for in the plebiscite!" (note, the plebiscite gave people a binary choice between "keep switching" and "the wrong one") and something about fetching kids before it gets dark. You could see the researcher getting more and more annoyed but she held her tongue.

Brian

FDChief said...

Yeah, the thing with DST in January is that means that sunrise is something like 8:30am. Of course, with Standard Time year-round the sunrise can be as early as 4am. The "problem" is having a mechanical clock. If you do, you either have to change it with the sunrise time, or live with the weird "daylight hours" that you're going to get if you don't.

Anonymous said...

You are quite right, you can still do it with a mechanical clock, though that too is "weird"! Hadn't really thought much about it until I read your comments about the natural say 3-minute-a-day change of time humans naturally do...

...so if it makes you feel any better, the monks of Mount Athos (an autonomous monastic polity in northern Greece) change their clocks every week so that the hours of the clock track the daylight hours (something like every Saturday as the sun goes down they adjust the clock so that sunset falls at 12:00? Or is it sunrise? Anyway I guess it's easy as each monastery probably only has one clock in the central courtyard).

But to prove your point, this is indeed impossible now that we are slaves to the mechanical clock. The monks get away with it because their clocks may be mechanical (though not electrical), but they are not slaves to them. They are rather slaves to the sun (especially if traditionally they do not use electricity at all) and their activity is strictly diurnal (besides presumably praising God, which continues when the sun goes down; club life or anything of the sort not being that big in a monastic state...). And on a historical note, this may be a holdover from the way time operated during the byzantine empire.

Anyway, the minute you get bored of being a slave to the mechanical clock (or simply want to explore a time operating regime from a bygone era), you now know where to go!

FDChief said...

I suspect that "time" as we think of it in the Industrial Age wasn't quite the tyrant then as it is now. People probably regulated their activities by the daylight hours, and in a fairly lax sort of way. The monastic communities were more rigid because of the liturgical day - you had to know when Lauds and Matins and Nones and Vespers were supposed to go.

And the Αυτόνομη Μοναστική Πολιτεία Αγίου Όρους - the "Monastic Republic of Mount Athos" - sounds like quite a piece of work. I like that to prevent even the slightest temptation of the brothers towards unholy female bits the only non-male things allowed within are hens (for eggs) and cats (to control the rodents).

Nestor said...

I think you are quite right. I have heard railroads (and their schedules) singled out for our enslavement to clocks, and I guess factories with their shifts could share some of the blame. But prior to that it makes sense if monastic communities were more punctual: it would help synchronizing the activities of the monks (common lunch, singing etc.), while with God being the boss, you really do not want to miss singing any hymn and incur the boss’s wrath. Probably why monasteries have all these bells and other sound signaling devices.

As for the Mount Athos polity it sounded great (real Shangri-La vibes): a land lost in time, not even really connected to the rest of the world, places of unique architecture on landscapes of breathtaking beauty, libraries full of ancient manuscripts, even the food and drink, fully organic, made by the monks… a place where our conventional ideas of time and money lose their meaning, nothing could spoil the mix right? ... oh right, that thing about women >_<

I don’t know what is it with religion and the “unholy lady bits”. Here it is even extending to other animals? I mean I don’t care much for females of the other species (although presumably the other species do), and I don’t see how other species getting nasty would be distracting (not to mention that obviously the rodents are sneaking in their girlfriends anyway)... Can’t religions just say that we have to abstain from and not be tempted by say marmite? I mean it still wouldn’t necessarily make sense, but it would be easier to accept!

FDChief said...

I have a similar problem with the monotheistic religions weird fixation with genitals; why all the hubbub, bub? How about you worry about pride and sloth and let people get busy however?

My guess is that it has something to do with the origins of the faiths; Judaism and Christianity in Semitic tribal culture and Islam in a similarly rigid Arab tribal setting. Those were both pretty harsh, pretty lockdown societies, all about top-down control from the patriarch or sheik or whoever. And one thing we know about humans; sex makes us kinda crazy. We do things for and because of sex that tend to knock over all the rules.

It's a wonderful flick for a lot of other reasons, but one of my favorite moments from the old Nineties romcom Moonstruck is when Nick Cage playing the "tragic" lead declares his passion for his inamorata:

“Loretta, I love you. Not like they told you love is, and I didn't know this either, but love doesn't make things nice, it ruins everything. It breaks your heart. It makes things a mess. We aren't here to make things perfect. The snowflakes are perfect. The stars are perfect. Not us. Not us! We are here to ruin ourselves and to break our hearts and love the wrong people and die. The storybooks are bullshit. Now I want you to come upstairs with me and get in my bed!”

Yep.

So...hens and cats and nothing else. Otherwise you'll end up loving the wrong sheep...