Part of the genesis of this post was a leftover image from the "Philippine Sea" writeup. I went looking for "WW2 Imperial Navy poster" and found this:
Which I thought was perfect; ships, flags, pretty pin-up girl...there you have your basic "Join the Navy, see the world and get laid" appeal that had probably been a central feature of every recruiter's spiel since the first Sumerian sergeant told lies to a bunch of dumb hicks straight off the farm.
The thing is...one of the other images Google showed me was this one:
Wrong country, right period, but...damn. Talk about a different way of looking at the whole "guns/girls" thing.
I find it hard to believe that even in 1944 an 18-year-old Japanese kid, male or female, had instincts much different than an American teenager. Different manners and mores, yes, but the hormones? Right in there pitching. Look at a picture of a pretty girl? He's thinking "I'd like to get next to that..." (and she's probably thinking "I'd like to be that so he will want to get next to me...").
But the WAVE practically radiates sex - she's a Petty pin-up, y'think..? - as opposed to the very G-rated patriotic Japanese gal in the IJN poster. No wonder so many other cultures think we're obsessed with our genitals.
Not that I think we really are - I think ALL humans spend tons of time thinking about putting Tab A into Slot B. Americans are just more upfront about it and it seems were were seventy years ago, too.
Mind you, the Japanese appear to have made up for lost time:
And that's pretty mild compared to the whole "tentacle rape" thing.
But that's a whole 'nother story.
Showing posts with label tentacle porn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tentacle porn. Show all posts
Saturday, October 03, 2015
Friday, November 02, 2012
Friday around the Blogoverse
I suppose it's tacky to blow your own horn, but, well, shit, this here's my horn and I'm gonna blow it.
I've got two pieces up at SlideRulePass. Both of them are about the Portland Timbers and both are pretty hardcore footy.
But I'm rather proud of them, so if you like my writing (and otherwise, why are you here? I won't kid you; the nude photos ain't gonna get posted in case you were still hoping...) and you like the Beautiful Game they are a little more in-depth than my soccer writing here.
In national news, I wanted to be a little more specific about why sane citizens of the United States making under $200,000 per annum have no business voting Republican.
First, there's this. Where anyone with a functioning reptile brain could come up with the idea that turning the federal government's emergency response powers into a goddamn clown show is beyond me but not, apparently, beyond the vast majority of Republicans.
The current GOP candidate seems to think that placing horse lawyers and political hacks in charge of disaster relief isn't even stupid enough; "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
Because I can't imagine that anyone in a position to make a profit from disaster relief would take advantage of that position to gouge, rape, and fuck over desperate people whose lives have been devastated by earthquakes or hurricanes.
Can you?
Then, there's this.
I'm now used to the idea that you can tell when a Republican is lying by just looking to see if his lips are moving. But, really...when the facts so brutally smash your moron-grade fantasies that you can't even come up with a winning lie to try and make thefucking idiots "independent voters" believe you rather than their ears and ears? When you have to try and respond to ugly truths by trying to hide them under the sofa and sitting on the lumpy cushion humming loudly enough to drown out the thumping and screeching from under your ass?
How thoroughly fuckolally fucked are you?
Are we?
One important point may well be that you tend to get fucked when you not only don't have good answers but aren't even asking the right questions. Mike Specter has a good piece in the New Yorker about California's Proposition 37, this election's measure to require labeling of genetically modified foods.
Now my position on GM foods as foods is that anyone who thinks we're not already eating GM foods and wearing apparel made from GM animals and plants is an idiot. The GM was just done by selective breeding rather than gene splicing in a lab, that's all.
Specter's piece points out that the campaigns on both sides of this proposition are characterized by a massive level of nonsense:
But there ARE some huge issues surrounding not just GM agriculture but industrial agriculture in general. Monoculturing? Reducing the genetic variation of food animals and plants (and through that their resistance to disease and unviable mutations)? Over-reliance on irrigation and chemical fertilization? The increasing distance (and reliance on cheap fuel for transport) between where foods are grown and where they are consumed?
Either nobody is asking these questions or nobody is listening.
And speaking of not asking the right questions, here's a good article from the journal International Security about the ridiculous effects that the "War on Terror" has had on our actual security and, obviously, liberties. Glenn Greenwald sums this up:
It's one thing to be fooled. But its another thing entirely to fool yourself.
But its better not to be a fool altogether.
But so as not to end with carping, courtesy of my witty and delectable friend Lisa (of Ranger Against War and the Story Project) here's a helpful guide for those of you who are still unsure of how to have sex with one of those poseable wooden mannequins.
It's from some sort of Japanese sex manual from the Sixties, complete with diagrams showing the potential Romeo-san how to woo his Juliet-sama, from the initial stages of hand holding and cute-face-touching to manipulating breasts (although, frankly, this page put me in mind of one of those IKEA cartoon instruction books showing you how to assemble a Billy bookcase).
It makes you wonder how the hell Japanese couples of the time managed to have any sort of normal relationship. I mean, I understand that all societies have their odd little conventions and quirks, but...
Oh.
Yeah.
There's that.
Oh and there's that, too.
Sigh.
Let's just face it; as a species we are very, very, very, very strange.
I've got two pieces up at SlideRulePass. Both of them are about the Portland Timbers and both are pretty hardcore footy.
But I'm rather proud of them, so if you like my writing (and otherwise, why are you here? I won't kid you; the nude photos ain't gonna get posted in case you were still hoping...) and you like the Beautiful Game they are a little more in-depth than my soccer writing here.
In national news, I wanted to be a little more specific about why sane citizens of the United States making under $200,000 per annum have no business voting Republican.
First, there's this. Where anyone with a functioning reptile brain could come up with the idea that turning the federal government's emergency response powers into a goddamn clown show is beyond me but not, apparently, beyond the vast majority of Republicans.
The current GOP candidate seems to think that placing horse lawyers and political hacks in charge of disaster relief isn't even stupid enough; "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
Because I can't imagine that anyone in a position to make a profit from disaster relief would take advantage of that position to gouge, rape, and fuck over desperate people whose lives have been devastated by earthquakes or hurricanes.
Can you?
Then, there's this.
I'm now used to the idea that you can tell when a Republican is lying by just looking to see if his lips are moving. But, really...when the facts so brutally smash your moron-grade fantasies that you can't even come up with a winning lie to try and make the
How thoroughly fuckolally fucked are you?
Are we?
One important point may well be that you tend to get fucked when you not only don't have good answers but aren't even asking the right questions. Mike Specter has a good piece in the New Yorker about California's Proposition 37, this election's measure to require labeling of genetically modified foods.
Now my position on GM foods as foods is that anyone who thinks we're not already eating GM foods and wearing apparel made from GM animals and plants is an idiot. The GM was just done by selective breeding rather than gene splicing in a lab, that's all.
Specter's piece points out that the campaigns on both sides of this proposition are characterized by a massive level of nonsense:
"Supporters of the proposition routinely make claims about the risks of eating, making, and cultivating genetically engineered foods for which there is simply no evidence. Big Ag, which doesn’t like regulation, claims that these labels will be useless, and insists that the new regime will set off an avalanche of lawsuits and cost consumers an unacceptable amount of money."(For which there is also no evidence, I should add).
But there ARE some huge issues surrounding not just GM agriculture but industrial agriculture in general. Monoculturing? Reducing the genetic variation of food animals and plants (and through that their resistance to disease and unviable mutations)? Over-reliance on irrigation and chemical fertilization? The increasing distance (and reliance on cheap fuel for transport) between where foods are grown and where they are consumed?
Either nobody is asking these questions or nobody is listening.
And speaking of not asking the right questions, here's a good article from the journal International Security about the ridiculous effects that the "War on Terror" has had on our actual security and, obviously, liberties. Glenn Greenwald sums this up:
"Unlike the actual, threatening wars of the past, this "war" is pure pretext, a total farce: so out of proportion to the civil liberties assaults employed in its name as to be inconceivable."I've wondered about this ever since our local G-men helped one of our local idiots delude himself that he was going to be the next Osama. Like the non-debate over GM crops, to me the worst part of this stuff is the utter lack of discussion - discussion, let alone concern - about how damaging this hysteria could be over the long term.
It's one thing to be fooled. But its another thing entirely to fool yourself.
But its better not to be a fool altogether.
But so as not to end with carping, courtesy of my witty and delectable friend Lisa (of Ranger Against War and the Story Project) here's a helpful guide for those of you who are still unsure of how to have sex with one of those poseable wooden mannequins.
It's from some sort of Japanese sex manual from the Sixties, complete with diagrams showing the potential Romeo-san how to woo his Juliet-sama, from the initial stages of hand holding and cute-face-touching to manipulating breasts (although, frankly, this page put me in mind of one of those IKEA cartoon instruction books showing you how to assemble a Billy bookcase).
It makes you wonder how the hell Japanese couples of the time managed to have any sort of normal relationship. I mean, I understand that all societies have their odd little conventions and quirks, but...
Oh.
Yeah.
There's that.
Oh and there's that, too.
Sigh.
Let's just face it; as a species we are very, very, very, very strange.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










